More Russia Bashing Over Nonexistent Cyberattacks

On October 7, a joint Department of Homeland Security/Director of National Intelligence (DHS/DNI) statement charged Russia with cyberattacks “intended to interfere with the US election process.”

It was a Big Lie. No evidence was cited because none exists. Accusations without proof are baseless. It had nothing to do with hacking DNC emails or interfering in America’s presidential election in any other way – nor meddling in the internal affairs of any country, longstanding US practice.

The DHS/DNI joint statement, claiming “confiden(ce)” about Russia cyberattacking “US political organizations” was politically motivated lying.

No matter. Obama ordered US intelligence agencies to review nonexistent Russian interference in the 2016 election process, completing a report before he leaves office on January 20.

It’s likely already written – a fictional account of what never happened. Interviewed by Time magazine after being named its person of the year, Trump said “I don’t believe it. I don’t believe (Russia) interfered…(S)ome guy in New Jersey” may have done it.

He called charges politically motivated, adding they “became a laughing point, not a talking point…Any time I do something, they say ‘Oh, Russia interfered.’ “ Putin and other Russian officials categorically debunked the false charges.

Obama administration homeland security advisor Lisa Monaco claimed “a new threshold” was likely crossed, calling it necessary “to conduct some after-action…”

Deputy White House press secretary Eric Schultz said Obama considers completing the report on his watch “a major priority.”

He’s got nothing better to do than bash Russia.

Last month, the White House declared the November election “free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.” If so, why investigate nonexistent Russian hacking?

Why conduct a recount scam in three states? Why accuse Moscow of election interference when it’s known none occurred?

It’s all about Russia bashing, longstanding plans calling for regime change, installing pro-Western puppet governance, etc.

It also points to powerful interests backing Hillary “remain(ing) intent upon undermining Trump’s accession to the White House (because he’s) not entirely in the pocket of the lobby groups,” according to Michel Chossudovsky.

Wanting to get along with Vladimir Putin, including cooperating with him in combating terrorism, conflicts with powerful interests wanting adversarial relations maintained, along with supporting ISIS and other terrorist groups, using them as imperial foot soldiers.

On Friday, Trump’s transition team released a statement, debunking notions of Russia interfering in America’s political process, saying “(t)hese are the same people (who) said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. The election ended (weeks ago). It’s now time to move on and ‘Make America Great Again.’ “

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected]

His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

Visit his blog site at

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Articles by: Stephen Lendman

About the author:

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected] His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III." Visit his blog site at Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected] contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]