Japan’s Prime Minister Abe on the Ropes – Sagging Popularity, Contentious Legacy

The BBC ran a story earlier this week about how Japan’s Prime Minister Abe has become embroiled in yet another corruption scandal for supposedly helping a friend secure government permission to build a veterinary clinic, which isn’t the first time that he’s accused of apparently abusing his office. As cited by the UK outlet, the Prime Minister is now polling at less than a 30% approval rating, which they predict might make it harder for him to win a third term in next year’s parliamentary elections.

There’s still quite a lot of time to go before then, however, and anything can happen to either improve or further diminish his standing in the eyes of the Japanese populace, but what’s important to focus on in this contemporary context is Abe’s legacy of leadership and the two major decisions that await him in the coming future. This will allow people to more comprehensively assess his overall political significance and reach their own conclusions on whether it’s a good or bad development that his popularity has recently tanked and his upcoming reelection prospects might be in jeopardy.

We can divide Abe’s political achievements thus far into two distinct categories – those which are likely attributable to his own personal leadership, and the ones that are probably geopolitical constants which would have happened regardless of whoever was in office. About the first group, we interestingly have both multipolar and unipolar legacies. On the one hand, Abe has personally involved himself in the Russian-Japanese rapprochement and is particularly passionate about the Kuril Islands issue, and he also spoke favorably about China’s One  Belt One Road global vision of New Silk Road connectivity and his country’s potential to invest in it, but on the other, he’s pioneered a revival of Japanese nationalism which frighteningly reminds the region of the island nation’s imperial fascist past and even went as far as reinterpreting the constitution to allow for the deployment of military forces abroad in order to ostensibly support Japan’s allies.

The mismatch between Abe’s multipolar and unipolar legacies thus far is confusing for many observers to make sense out of, and it doesn’t help any that his country has also actively gotten involved in the South China Sea dispute, is streamlining the so-called “Freedom Corridor” with India as a counter to the New Silk Road, and is supporting India as a continental counterweight to China, all of which could be attributable to geopolitical constants that aren’t as closely dependent on Abe’s personal leadership as the other four examples that were just mentioned.

[GR Editor’s Note: Complex and contradictory geopolitics: India has recently become a full member of the SCO, which could lead to establishing closer relations with China and Russia]

Looking forward, however, there are two pressing decisions that Abe will be forced to personally make if he’s successful in recovering from his recent unpopularity and winning reelection next year, and that’s whether to go forward with China’s multilateral free trade proposal of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP, and to fulfill his promise to revise the constitution by 2020 in order to formalize his administration’s nationalist reinterpretation of its pacifist clauses.

The post presented is the partial transcript of the CONTEXT COUNTDOWN radio program on Sputnik News, aired on Friday Jul 28, 2017:

Andrew Korybko is an American Moscow-based political analyst specializing in the relationship between the US strategy in Afro-Eurasia, China’s One Belt One global vision of New Silk Road connectivity, and Hybrid Warfare.


Articles by: Andrew Korybko

About the author:

Andrew Korybko est le commentateur politique étasunien qui travaille actuellement pour l’agence Sputnik. Il est en troisième cycle de l’Université MGIMO et auteur de la monographie Guerres hybrides: l’approche adaptative indirecte pour un changement de régime(2015).

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]