CIA Looking at Your Financial Transactions: Collecting Records from the Likes of Western Union Under the Patriot Act

Slowly but surely, Spook Central is showing its cards. Spook Central is the national security state – from the NSA to the CIA to dozens of intelligence manifestations woven through the federal government.

In 2010, the Washington Post, the former crown jewel of Operation Mockingbird, the CIA takeover of corporate media, reported there were at that time 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States working feverishly on the grand ruse that is counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence. According to the Post, the so-called intelligence community, more accurately a monolith rivaling anything created by the former Soviet Union or East Germany’s Stasi combined, in toto includes 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances.

Now we learn that the CIA is “secretly” – secret because it is posted on the New York Times website – collecting financial transaction records from the likes of Western Union under the Patriot Act. This is the same law exploited by the NSA. This massive violation of the Fourth Amendment is overseen by the secret FISA court, its very existence a magnificent violation of the Constitution.

“Former U.S. government officials familiar with the program said it has been useful in discovering terrorist relationships and financial patterns,” reports the Wall Street Journal. “If a CIA analyst searches the data and discovers possible suspicious terrorist activity in the U.S., the analyst provides that information to the FBI, a former official said.”

There is no shortage of terrorists to go around. In 2007, the Inspector General of the Justice Department reported that the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center database contained over 700,000 names and the list was growing at a whopping 20,000 names per month. In other words, the list now has well over a million names. So there is a lot of financial data for the CIA to sift through and pass on to the rest of the departments at Spook Central, including your local cop shop and the FBI where the CIA has long maintained a presence.

It is said this “data does not include purely domestic transfers or bank-to-bank transactions,” a polite way to say that foreign transfers are covered as well and are thus, for old time sake, within the purview of the CIA’s moth-eaten charter. We are also told the secret FISA court “imposed rules withholding the identities of any Americans from the data the CIA” and has mandated “that the data be discarded after a certain number of years.”

The CIA has thus far “declined to confirm whether such a program exists, but said that the agency conducts lawful intelligence collection aimed at foreign — not domestic — activities and that it is subject to extensive oversight.” The intelligence committees in Congress are naturally subject to “give and take,” in other words the most secret stuff remains secret and, at best, a few vetted and trusted souls high atop the committee hierarchy are privy to the scratched surface of the national security state. Before Edward Snowden, the NSA also said it only snoops on the communications of terrorists in caves.

Of course, none of this is news. It’s just that the CIA wants you to know about it now. It sort of concentrates the fear and paranoia factor on the coattails of all those numbing NSA revelations. Back in 2006, when nobody really gave much of a hoot, it was discovered that the CIA was in bed with Western Union. “Western Union had twelve thousand offices across the globe, thirteen hundred in Pakistan alone. There was no country more important in battling the terrorists,” an FBI official said according to that good old thorn in the government’s side, Cryptome.

Then there was all that mischievous behavior back in 1945 when military “SIGINT operatives met with representatives of the three main telegraph companies – ITT World Communications, Western Union International and RCA Global (both now part of MCI Worldcom) – starting Operation Shamrock, a 30-year illegal coordinated program to spy on the electronic communications of American citizens,” as James Bamford told The Age in 2002.

The telegraph companies each night packaged up the day’s transmissions and handed them to operatives who sent them to NSA headquarters in Virginia [actually Fort Meade, Maryland] for analysis. During the Vietnam War the NSA used the information gathered to compile a watch-list (Codeword: MINARET) of more than 600 “dangerous” Americans, including folksinger Joan Baez, pediatrician Benjamin Spock, actress Jane Fonda and civil rights campaigner Dr Martin Luther King. The NSA claims in 1974 it destroyed files on more than 75,000 other Americans it illegally collected during Shamrock.

The NSA likes to say it no longer carries on with Shamrock, but how can we be sure? It was Richard Nixon’s handpicked successor, Gerald Ford, who closed a steel trap around the illicit doings of the NSA and its willing corporate accomplices. “President Gerald R. Ford extended executive privilege, which shielded those involved from testifying publicly, to the telecommunications companies on the recommendation of then chief-of-staff Dick Cheney and then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.”

Articles by: Kurt Nimmo

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected] contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]