Global Research

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Big Tech’s Effort to Silence Truth-tellers: Global Research Online Referral Campaign

***

In 2023, the commander Cornelis van der Klaauw from the Royal Netherlands Navy and Expert from Strategic Communications and Information Operations NATO Joint Warfare Centre wrote in the article “Cognitive Warfare”:

“The reason why cognitive attacks go unnoticed by their targets is that cognitive activities bypass the conscious mind and directly target the subconscious of a person… most of our decisions are made by our subconscious… cognitive attacks are not science fiction anymore. They are already taking place now… neural nanotechnology can be used to bring nano-sized robots close to a neuron via the bloodstream and make it possible to link the human brain directly (i.e. not intercepted by our senses) to a computer, making use of artificial intelligence in the process… While other domains can provide tactical and operational victories, the human domain is the only domain in which we can secure a full victory“ (see this).

In December 2021, the U.S. Naval postgraduate school in Monterey, California awarded to two of its students a Master of Science degree in Defence Analysis for the thesis “Neurowar Is Here!“. In the study they stated:

“great power competition has returned to the forefront of international relations, as China and Russia seek to contest America’s global leadership… this contest is ultimately a battle… to manipulate and control both adversaries and domestic populations alike. The battle for influence begins and ends in the human mind, where reality is perceived“ (pg.V) .

They identified neuroweapons as the weapons of this battle,

“that specifically target the brain or the central nervous system in order to affect the targeted person’s mental state, mental capacity and ultimately the person’s behavior in a specific and predictable way” (pg.3).

None of those informations appeared in the world mass media. Does that not mean that we are living in a world, where mass media are (at the request of governments) hiding from people the ongoing battle for the control of their minds and thoughts?

In the year 2000, the European Parliament’s Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA) published a study on “Crowd Control Technologies“, where it admitted that

“In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals”

and explained that

“The most controversial non-lethal crowd control and anti-materiel technology proposed by the US are so-called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior in a variety of unusual ways“

and

“the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system… The research undertaken to date both in the US and in Russia can be divided into two related areas: (i) individual mind control and (ii) crowd control”  (pg.XIV, LIIII).

In January 1999, after a hearing at the European Parliament on the American system HAARP, the parliament approved a resolution, where it called “for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” (see this).

The fact that mass media of the Member states of the European Union never publicly discussed those weapons proves that the member states of the NATO signed an agreement demanding them to classify this information. The same policy is observed by the governments around the world.

The EU is actually working “on a bill to ensure AI in Europe is safe, respects fundamental rights and democracy“. This bill is supposed to ban “AI systems that manipulate human behaviour to circumvent their free will“ and even “to influence the outcome of elections and voter behavior“ (see this). So far the European Union did not incorporate in this bill the ban of the use of energies which make it possible to use the artificial intelligence and neurotechnologies to control the human nervous system at distance. Evidently the EU is respecting the NATO agreement to classify this technology. For that matter the present EU documents mention only the brain computer inferfaces as a means threatening fundamental human rights and democracy.

The brain activity is changing according to changes in frequency and number of firing of neurons in the brain and is accessible to any energy which will produce in neurons electrical currents in the frequencies of different activities of the human brain. This may be induced by extra long electromagnetic waves transmitted in the natural frequencies of the human brain or by microwaves pulsed in the brain frequencies or possibly by energies discovered by quantum physics. Extra long electromagnetic waves will, due to their length, control the brain activity of masses of people while directed pulsed microwaves can be used to target individual brains.

The USA, Russia and China own systems, which are, among others, capable of producing strong electric currents in the ionosphere by transmitting there pulsed microwaves in the brain frequencies. Those alternating currents produce in the ionosphere intensive elecgtromagnetic waves in the the brain frequencies which reach large areas of the planet and will control the brain activity of their populations.

China, with the help of Russia, started the construction of its system manipulating the ionosphere in theHainan province in 2017 (see this). In July 2023, The Washington Times published an article, where it stated:

“China‘s People’s Liberation Army is developing high-technology weapons designed to disrupt brain functions and influence government leaders or entire populations, according to a report by three open-source intelligence analysts.“

The USA operate the system HAARP, which inspired the European Parliament to call for “for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” (see this and this), and Russia operates the system Sura, the experimentation with which convinced China to build their own system in Hainan province.

Masses of people could be controlled as well by satelite systems pulsing microwaves in the brain frequencies, especially, if “nano-sized robots were delivered close to a neuron via the bloodstream“ into their brains, as Cornelis van der Klaauw put it at the beginning of this article. Those “robots“ (or rather antennas) are already used in medical neurotechnology (see this). They are so small that they can penetrate via blood through the blood-brain barrier into the brain. They can be delivered to the blood via breathing, drinking, eating or by vaccination.

The cell phone networks could be used to control the activity of the human nervous system, if their microwave frequencies were pulsed in the brain frequencies, as well. The first experiments with manipulation of the human brain activity by pulsed microwaves succeeded even without use of any particles in the brain (see this) and it is no secret that cell phone radiation, pulsed in 217 Herz produces this frequency in the human brain activity (see this).

At present time, there exists no international agreement banning the use of artificial intelligence and neurotechnologies for the remote control of the human nervous systems, thoughts, emotions, subconscious etc. There is no other explanation for it, than that the great powers are competing to master the world in this way. In 1997 the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College published the book ”Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War”, where it wrote:

”Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ”potential” or ”active”, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor, and focus psychological campaigns for each” (pg. 24-25).

This is an American project for global control of the world. There is no doubt that similar projects are being developed in China and Russia as well.

To protect the world history from reaching this inhuman end, it is necessary that world governments sign an international agreement banning the use of neurotechnologies and artificial intelligence to control the activity of human brains at distance, similar to agreements that banned the use of chemical and biological weapons. The observance of this ban should be supervised by the United Nations Organization. For right now we can help it only by requiring the European Parliament to ban technologies of remote control of the activity of the human nervous system. It must be forbidden to natural persons, legal persons, marketing companies and criminal organizations, as well as to government agencies and foreign governments.

Sign the petition here.

The European Union can set an example and a challenge to the rest of the world in this way.

For more information, see this and this.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Mojmir Babacek was born in 1947 in Prague, Czech Republic. Graduated in 1972 at Charles University in Prague in philosophy and political economy. In 1978 signed the document defending human rights in  communist Czechoslovakia „Charter 77“. Since 1981 until 1988 lived in emigration in the USA. Since 1996 he has published articles on different subjects mostly in the Czech and international alternative media.

In 2010, he published a book on the 9/11 attacks in the Czech language. Since the 1990‘s he has been striving to help to achieve the international ban of remote control of the activity of the human nervous system and human minds with the use of neurotechnology.