Three Children (Ages 12, 13, 14) Died in Spain from Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines (FG7898, FG9428). Now Their Parents Are Going After Spanish Ministers of Health and Officials

Parents must join forces!

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

***

Spain – Sep. 22, 2023 (Translated) – Three parents denounce Ministry of Health for the sudden death of their children after taking the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine.

Juan José, Marvellous and Daniel were 12, 13 and 14 years old, respectively, when they died suddenly playing sports.

Their names are Juan José Quirós López (12), Marvellous Ounanefe Johnson Andrews (13) and Daniel Herce Rodríguez (14). They were 12, 13, and 14 years old, respectively. No previous history of pathologies. They died suddenly from hypertrophic heart disease – the first two – and cardiac arrhythmia. Their parents, who assure THE OBJECTIVE they were “perfectly healthy” before vaccination, blame it on the Covid-19 vaccine, and this Thursday (Sep.21) they have filed a complaint with the State Attorney General’s Office for homicide due to serious recklessness, genetic manipulation, threats, coercion, public health, prevarication, against moral integrity with damage to life and abuse of authority.

This means has accompanied the parents to file the complaint, which has been drafted by the Liberum Association, and that is directed against the former Ministers of Health Salvador Illa and Carolina Darias. A posteriori, they have addressed the Ministry that is located in Madrid’s Paseo del Prado to deliver it with the intention of investigating their cases. They have been asking for it for a year, but it has been in vain.

“We want justice to be done, and more parents to join our complaint” they sob before this journalist. Daniel died suddenly while lying on the sofa at home. “I thought he had fallen asleep, but then he didn’t get up”, remembers Diana, his mother. Her son had been vaccinated with (Pfizer) lot FG7898, that registered adverse effects. Marvellous and Juan José, on the other hand, the same batch of Pfizer vaccine had been injected, FG9428. Both died suddenly, one playing soccer and the other in the schoolyard.

The complaint, to which you have had access THE OBJECTIVE in its entirety, regrets that “from the administrations and health authorities pretend that [the parents] believe that these deaths should be classified as natural death, and that the possibility of the recognized adverse effect of the vaccines against COVID-19 has not even been raised, so that, in addition one of the minors [Juan] will become infected with SARS-CoV-2, after two inoculations, giving positive to the PCR post mortem”.

Parents report that their children were “perfectly healthy”, and that they only began to experience respiratory complications after inoculation. “My child began to suffocate when he ran, had never happened to him”, says Soledad, representing the parents of the young man from Malaga, who are still very “affected” to have been able to appear in the Prosecutor’s Office. He still cries when reviewing the text of the complaint, he sees the image of the body of his nephew.

A “Natural Death”? 

Parents report that the only explanation they received is that their minor children had died “naturally”, and that it was probably due to a “hereditary” issue. “How will it be natural for a 12-year-old athlete to die suddenly?”, clamor Soledad, Juan José’s aunt. To Felix, Marvellous’s father, has already undergone numerous cardiac tests.

“It seems that the Institute of Legal Medicine is desperately looking for one of the parents to have a heart condition”, complains Alexis Aneas, Liberum’s lawyer representing the complainants. He recalls that Felix’s son “had federal recognition in September and declared him fit to play”. He died in December. The complaint states that the heart of the deceased was “increased in size”: 480 grams when it was to oscillate around 344.

“Pfizer recognized early that tens of thousands of effects of myocarditis in young people”, recalls Aneas, who is also an expert in health issues, who abounds: “It makes sense because the age group where pathologies appear is 12 to 15 years old, who received the adult dose. From 5 to 11, the vaccine has a third of the dose. The ailment can occur because the Spike protein that is replicated by the vaccine lodges in the receptors of the heart tissue and generates an autoimmune disease, which causes thickening of the myocardium, what is known as pericarditis or arrhythmia”.

Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines

Alexis Aneas also wonders “how it will be natural for an athlete child to die of an arrhythmia”. Liberum’s spokesman says they are “fed up with administrations telling us that people die by chance”, and points to Daniel’s case. “He had neuronal damage that could be due to the fact that the substance generates prions that cross the brain barrier, as demonstrated by a study that we attached in the complaint”, a suspicion, since “what we want is for it to be investigated”.

The complaint is also directed against the president of the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS), Silvia Calzón, and the director, Maria Jesus Lamas, as well as “any other authority that, from the investigative actions, derives criminal liability for the events reported”.

In this one, it charges against Pfizer and Moderna, noting that “according to the clinical trial, eight cases of COVID-19 were recorded in the vaccinated group out of a total of 18,198 participants 7 days after receiving the second dose; while in the placebo group 162 cases were recorded out of 18,325 participants”.

With these data, the laboratory advertised an efficacy of 95% of the vaccine compared to the non-inoculated ones. But from Liberum they denounce that “this form of expression of efficacy of a medicine is biased and misleading”: “In absolute terms, the reality was that the incidence of PCR+ had been 0.8% in the placebo group (162 / 18,325), compared to 0.04% in the vaccinated group (8 / 18,198), a difference of 0.76%”. Based on this data they ask, “why did children have to be vaccinated, when the best interests of the minor should prevail, if they are not a reservoir of this disease?”

Call to More Parents 

This is the first complaint in which parents hold the authorities to account for the death of their children after vaccination against COVID-19. The Diario de Sevilla newspaper reported last June on how at least seven people had reported serious injuries to Health after receiving any of the doses of the coronavirus remedy. One of them, represented by the law firm of Fernando Osuna, claimed more than one million euros for having lost “97% of his vision”, in addition to having limitations in his legs.

The intention of the complaint is also to call other parents who find themselves in a similar situation to action. “These three deaths of young athletes, performing physical activity, are not the only ones in our country”, reads the complaint, which exposes dozens of cases, with screenshots from journalistic publications, of deaths of other minors doing sports.

From the Liberum Association they ask the health authorities a question: “How many more deceased children do they need, to start investigating?”.

Sep. 25, 2023 – Spain: Parents sue ex-Ministers of Health for the death of their children after vaccination.

Ontario man files $35.6 million lawsuit against Pfizer over son’s vaccine death.

New Tecumseth, ON, resident Dan Hartman has initiated a wrongful death lawsuit against Pfizer because his son Sean died from the COVID-19 vaccine. 

“On the morning of September 27, 2021, 33 days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, Sean Hartman was found deceased in his bedroom by his mother,” said Sheikh Law lawyer Umar Sheikh in a court filing. 

“The Plaintiff pleads that Sean Hartman died as a result of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.” 

Dan was denied money from the Vaccine Injury Support Program in March despite Sean dying after getting the COVID-19 vaccine. 

“My son died 33 days after his first Pfizer vaccine and he was a perfectly healthy boy with no underlying conditions,” he said. 

He took a COVID-19 vaccine to be allowed to play hockey. Dan said he took him to the emergency room four days after his first dose because he had brown circles around his eyes, a rash on his face and pain in his right shoulder. 

American pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole determined in July Sean died from the COVID-19 vaccine.  

Cole examined his tissues, finding spike protein in his adrenal glands.

“The adrenal glands control your blood pressure, so if Sean’s blood pressure dropped, he would have died,” said Dan. 

Dan is seeking $35.6 million in damages; specialized damages to be determined prior to the trial; prejudgment and post-judgment interest; the costs of the proceeding, including all applicable taxes; and further relief the court considers just. 

Sheikh said Pfizer “owed a duty of care to Sean Hartman to accurately inform him of all risks associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.” He added it owed him a duty to warn him of the risks associated with the safety and efficacy of these vaccines. 

When it comes to the standard of care, Dan pleaded Pfizer breached it for the manufacturing, testing, sale, reporting and administration of its vaccines. 

With the standard of care, Sheikh alleged it was breached when it disregarded and misrepresented the results of the safety trials by providing an incorrect characterization of the efficacy data; discounting results of adverse events on vaccinated people in the study; not highlighting all results and adverse events revealed in the studies conducted; and not stopping their administration on Canadians due to known safety concerns. 

Dan pleaded Pfizer negligently misrepresented the safety of the vaccine and did not disclose the risks associated with it, which include but are not limited to myocarditis and pericarditis. 

The particulars include failing to disclose people under 40 years old had an increased risk of myocarditis after taking the vaccine, rates of myocarditis were higher in adolescent males, inadequate testing was performed to ensure their safety and efficacy, failing to complete post-market surveillance and inform the Canadian government and the public of the results, failing to disclose the issues with the vaccine, and failing to identify, implement, and verify procedures to address post-market surveillance risks. 

He accused Pfizer of improper product distribution when it was being sold. This is because the foreseeable risks exceeded the benefits associated with the product, it was more dangerous than ordinary consumers would expect, it did not have adequate, effective warnings and instructions over these dangers, inadequate testing and it was unfit for the purpose for which it was intended. 

Sheikh concluded by saying Pfizer “concealed the fact the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination had severe possible risks and outcomes when administered, including but not limited to myocarditis, pericarditis and death, to the public, healthcare providers, and regulatory authorities, including Health Canada.” 

“The Plaintiff pleads that the wrongful death of his son Sean Hartman was caused by the negligence of the Defendant,” he said.

My Take…

The criminal complaints and lawsuits have begun.

It is crucial for parents of children killed by COVID-19 Vaccines to join forces, and support each other in battling large corrupt pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna and in holding Health Officials and politicians personally liable for the injuries and deaths they caused.

I believe in time we will discover that many politicians and Healthcare Leaders received bribes or some form of “compensation” to push toxic experimental COVID-19 vaccines they knew would injure or kill many of the recipients, including pregnant women and children.

The battle for justice is only beginning.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Dr. William Makis is a Canadian physician with expertise in Radiology, Oncology and Immunology. Governor General’s Medal, University of Toronto Scholar. Author of 100+ peer-reviewed medical publications.

Featured image is from COVID Intel


The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity

by Michel Chossudovsky

Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.

“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”

Reviews

This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon

In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia

In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig 

Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac

A reading of  Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late.  You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin

ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0,  Year: 2022,  PDF Ebook,  Pages: 164, 15 Chapters

Price: $11.50 FREE COPY! Click here (docsend) and download.

We encourage you to support the eBook project by making a donation through Global Research’s DonorBox “Worldwide Corona Crisis” Campaign Page


Articles by: Dr. William Makis

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]