UN Vote on MH17 Tribunal Resolution Staged to Implicate Russia

"A kangaroo court, but that’s insulting the kangaroos”: Chossudovsky

Experts claim that the United States and its European allies forced a UN Security Council vote on the MH17 tribunal resolution on Wednesday because they knew Russia would cast what the Western powers hope to frame as an incriminating veto.

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The United States and its European allies forced a UN Security Council vote on the MH17 tribunal resolution on Wednesday because they knew Russia would cast what the Western powers hope to frame as an incriminating veto, experts told Sputnik.

“What they [the United States and its allies] are going to say, with the support of Western media propaganda, is that Russia vetoed the [UN MH17] resolution because it was scared that it would be indicted,” Centre for Research on Globalization Director Michel Chossudovsky told Sputnik on Wednesday.

Earlier on Wednesday, Russia vetoed a draft UN Security Council resolution that would establish an international tribunal to prosecute the perpetrators of the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine.

The Western media, Chossudovsky argued, will develop a storyline that the Russians voted against the resolution to prevent a probe into who is responsible for the MH17 crash because it might point to the pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Moscow actually wants to discover the real truth, Chossudovsky claimed, which will not be found in a UN mock court that aims to put Moscow and the pro-Russian rebels on trial before all the evidence is gathered.

“Washington and its European allies have been attempting to manipulate the evidence because what they seek in this tribunal is to accuse Russia,” Chossudovsky said. “We can call it a kangaroo court, but that’s insulting the kangaroos.”

All of the evidence gathered to date by OSCE monitors, Dutch investigators and a brave BBC reporter [who’s TV report was censored and taken down by the BBC] , Chossudovsky elaborated, indicate that the MH17 was shot down by an air-to-air attack, which rules out allegations that the plane was downed by pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine using land-to-air weaponry.

Swedish Doctors for Human Rights Chairman Marcello Ferrada de Noli told Sputnik that the Western public is constantly spoon-fed Russophobic propaganda, and the political motives of UN members will render the tribunal verdict a fait accompli.

“The governments and media in those countries that would be integrating the committee [UN tribunal] have already, without exhibiting beyond-doubt proof, ascribed the MH17 crash to the Donbass militia,” de Noli said.

Introducing the UN MH17 tribunal resolution only fuels the unfortunate new “Cold War” that has been restarted to serve the military and financial interests of the Western powers, de Noli added.

On Wednesday, Russian envoy to the UN Vitaly Churkin said “there are no grounds” for the creation of the tribunal. Churkin also said, however, that Russia is ready to continue assisting a thorough and objective investigation into the causes and circumstances of the Boeing 777 crash.

The Dutch Safety Board, authorized to conduct an investigation into the MH17 incident, released a preliminary report on the crash in September 2014, revealing that the plane broke up in mid-air after being hit by a number of high-energy objects penetrating the plane from the outside.

Articles by: Sputnik

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]