Print

Sloppy Journalism: The Associated Press is a “Superspreader” of Fake News
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, May 07, 2021

Url of this article:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/sloppy-journalism-the-associated-press-is-a-superspreader-of-fake-news/5744665

A recent Associated Press (AP) “report” entitled “The superspreaders behind top COVID-19 conspiracy theories”,  directed against several authors, academics and independent media including Global Research describes Michel Chossudovsky as “a professor emeritus of economics … and a conspiracy theorist who has argued the U.S. military can control the weather”. (emphasis added)

The insinuation is that the Independent media including Global Research are “Superspreaders” intent upon misleading public opinion.

My response: “do you home work”.  Sloppy journalism and “Fake News” on this and other issues including Covid.

There is a vast literature on weather modification for military use. Do your “Fact-checking”. The US Military can control the weather. And that is not a conspiracy theory, that’s a conspiracy fact.

I refer the distinguished AP journalists David Klepper, et al to consult the US Air Force document entitled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

We are dealing with REAL weapons of mass destruction and WHY is it not being reported upon.

It’s scary? Weather Modification for Military Use (2025) coincides chronologically with Joe Biden’s “New Cold War” and the World Economic Forum’s “Global Reset”.

I also suggest that the Associated Press consult the following document:

The Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, United Nations, Geneva: 18 May 1977

Guided by the interest of consolidating peace, … and of saving mankind from the danger of using new means of warfare, (…) Recognizing that military … use of such [environmental modification techniques] could have effects extremely harmful to human welfare, Desiring to prohibit effectively military … use of environmental modification techniques in order to eliminate the dangers to mankind. … and affirming their willingness to work towards the achievement of this objective, (…) Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military … use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.

(Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, United Nations, Geneva, May 18, 1977. Entered into force: 5 October 1978)

What we are dealing with is a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD) which has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media, with some exceptions. Its deployment by the US Air Force is in violation of the 1978 convention quoted above.

This CBC documentary below released in the 1990s says the truth.

Those were the days of honest journalism.

(I will not comment on what the CBC has become today).

To watch this engaging 15-minute CBC documentary online, click here.

 

When the Lie Becomes the Truth. When War Becomes Peace

I have undertaken research on both “weather warfare” as well on as the use of “low yield” tactical nuclear weapons which are now being upheld as an instrument of peace. They are categorized as mini-nukes “harmless to civilians” with an explosive capacity between one third and 12 times a Hiroshima bomb.

The mainstream media casually describes nuclear weapons as a means to achieving World peace. It’s called “nuclear peace”.

According to “scientific opinion” (quoted by the  mainstream media “Superspreaders”):

“controlled nuclear proliferation [by the US] may be beneficial for inducing stability”.

And Joe Biden is now committed to extending Obama’s $1.2 trillion dollar nuclear weapons program which is intended to protect the “Free World”. What nonsense!

***

See also

Michel Chossudovsky, Weather Warfare: Beware the US military’s experiments with climatic warfare, The Ecologist, December 2007

 

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article.