Recognition of the State of Palestine: Negotiations to “End All Peace” …

Following the historical recognition by the Swedish government, British legislators voted overwhelmingly on a non-binding resolution urging their government to recognise the state of Palestine.

Ireland’s Seanad and Spain’s parliament passed similar motions on October 22 and November 18 respectively.

Sweden, the home of the Nobel Peace Prize, has positioned itself in the forefront of European nations, who in time, would most likely follow in its footsteps and recognise the state of Palestine.

On the other side of the Channel, the government of David Cameron has a unique opportunity to heed British legislators and rectify a small part of Britain’s historical sin when its mandate power transformed Palestine from a nation of over 90 per cent Muslim and Christian majority into a new transplanted Jewish majority.

France’s National Assembly has scheduled its resolution for November 28. A vote to take place almost 67 years to the day when 33 countries ‘“ mostly vassal states ‘“ passed a UN resolution in 1947 to divide Palestine between its original inhabitants and Jewish immigrants.

Israeli ambassador to Ireland protested the European recognitions calling it ‘stunt gestures’ providing an excuse to Palestinians ‘who hope to achieve their goals without talking directly with Israel’.

Unless the Israeli ambassador was addressing an extraterrestrial horde, everyone on this planet knows that Palestinians have been ‘talking directly with Israel’ for at least 23 years. Starting in 1991 at the Madrid talks and 24 years after Israel occupied the West Bank, Palestinians and Israelis have spent about one year of ‘talking’ for every year of occupation.

If Israel genuinely believes that ‘talking” is the best approach, why wouldn’t they give the international community a chance to talk more with Iran instead of sanctions and threat of war?

Iran and the P5+1 have talked for less than one-seventh of that between Palestinians and Israel. While negotiations with Iran were conducted under a strict sanction regime, Israel used ‘talking’ to create ‘Jewish facts’ on the ground rendering it impossible to establish a viable Palestinian state.

Israeli leaders talk in vague terms about a two-state solution; however, respective Israeli governments have refused to spell out clearly the geographic location of such a state. In fact, many Israeli leaders have advocated that Palestine was in Jordan.

According to David Horovitz of the Times of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu had made it ‘explicitly’ clear that he could ‘never, ever, countenance a full sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank’.

Just days after American, Jordanian, Palestinian and Israeli leaders met in Jordan to reduce current tension in Jerusalem, Israel issued new permits to build more Jewish-only homes and Avigdor Lieberman, Israeli foreign minister declared ‘We won’t accept any limitation on building’ in occupied East Jerusalem.

Washington reiterated, academically, its ‘unequivocal’ opposition to new colonies in East Jerusalem. Interestingly while appeasing the Palestinian Authority (PA) with lip services, the US on the other hand provides Israel with the financial means and the political protection to do the very things it ‘unequivocally’ condemns.

With Sweden’s domino effect, and the pending resolution before the UN Security Council to set a timetable to end Israeli occupation, the onus remains on the PA to push further and request the International Criminal Court (ICC) to adjudicate on Israeli violations of international law.

Two years ago, the PA fumbled the UN recognition when it delayed joining the ICC and used that small victory as a cover to justify a return to the endless and aimless negotiations.

The PA should understand that recent international recognition is no cause for another pause. Small successes are effective only if they are used as part of a continuum towards achieving holistic objectives.

The PA must thrust forward to translate recognition into a reality or allow the Palestinian street to ‘negotiate’ with Israel. There isn’t much to lose, but Israeli-issued VIP passes.

Mr Kanj ( writes regular newspaper column and publishes on several websites on Arab world issues. He is the author of “Children of Catastrophe,” Journey from a Palestinian Refugee Camp to America. A version of this article was first published by the Gulf Daily News newspaper.

Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Articles by: Jamal Kanj

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected] contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]