Hugely increased arms shipments and loans would be the policy of the new White House for a US-armed Israel to dominate the Middle East on behalf of America
Whoever is elected US president next November, whether Republican nominee Donald Trump or Democrat Hillary Clinton, they will likely have the advantage of hundreds of millions of dollars in casino funds plus the power of the AIPAC lobby in Washington and the CFI lobby and BICOM in London all being either key players or major factors in an international movement to legalise the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
Upon completion of the land grab, the Netanyahu government would carry out a unilateral annexation of all of the Occupied Territories whilst contemporaneously expelling the 5 million indigenous Palestinians in a forced transfer from ancestral lands to new refugee camps in adjoining states.
This would signal the commencement of the ‘Greater Israel’ project: an illegal expansionist programme that extends from the Nile to the Euphrates in order to fulfil the Likud Zionist agenda for a nuclear hegemon that would be able to control not only the Middle East but, through its agents and government ministers embedded in the British Parliament and the US Congress, to dictate the global foreign defence and trade policy of NATO, NAFTA, Britain and the EU.
Both Trump and Clinton, in their individual bids to achieve the White House incumbency, are expected to promise unlimited support for the legalisation of the settlements and their annexation as they reject the establishment of a Palestinian state by deliberately rejecting the will of the United Nations in a gross violation of international law.
In direct opposition to the hard-won democratic values for which so many allied forces died in two world wars, these self-interested politicians and their backers intend to take the world back to a time of military domination in order to create a neo-colonial, (nuclear) super state that will impose its will upon the political and economic direction of over half the world, and the disintegration of Europe.
But only if we, and the UN Security Council, are prepared to allow such a global catastrophe.