Impeachment Resolution Scam by House Dems


On Monday, anti-Trump Speaker Pelosi released the text of the undemocratic Dems’ impeachment resolution, aiming to remove Trump from office for the wrong reasons, ignoring legitimate right ones.

For Dems and supportive media, it’s the second time around against DJT after the failed Russiagate witch hunt scam, Ukrainegate with no legitimacy its spinoff.

The resolution outlines procedures for conducting the impeachment probe — to be voted on Thursday, according to Pelosi, passage virtually certain in the Dem controlled House.

House Rules Committee chairman James McGovern said the Dem-led House “continue(s) (its) investigation (into) whether sufficient grounds exist for the House…to exercise its constitutional power to impeach” the president.

According to unnamed White House official, the Rules Committee said Trump will be to participate in the probe, adding: “(E)xplicit participation for the White House…is not in the resolution.”

It states the Judiciary Committee is authorized to conduct impeachment proceedings, “including such procedures as to allow for the participation of the president and his counsel.”

Thursday’s vote, if held as announced, will be the first one since Dems began their impeachment inquiry in late September.

According to a mid-October Gallup poll “52% of Americans now support Trump’s impeachment and removal,” his approval rating at 39%, adding:

“Currently, 87% of Republicans, 34% of independents and 5% of Democrats approve of the job Trump is doing.”

Support for impeachment among Dems “approaches 90%,” only 6% by Republicans.

House members are constitutionally authorized to impeach a sitting president. Senate members have sole power to try the executive or other US officials if impeached.

The Constitution’s Article II, Section 4 states: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Impeachment is only warranted when criminal offenses of a president or other officials are too serious to ignore.

That’s clearly not what Dems want Trump removed from office for, ignoring legitimate reasons the vast majority in Washington are guilty of, notably high crimes of war and against humanity, along with time and again betraying the public trust.

Removing a president or other US official requires a two-thirds Senate super-majority, a high-hurdle never gotten in US history.

The Constitution’s Article I, Section 3 states: “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose…”

“When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.”

“Present” is the key word. Anti-Trump Senate Dems no doubt would show up in force to vote for removing him from office in an impeachment trial is held.

If unknown numbers of GOP senators unenthusiastic about supporting him aren’t present, he could be removed from office with a two-thirds majority as long as a minimum of 51 senators participated in the vote.

House and Senate Dems want him sullied for political advantage, seeking an edge in November 2020 elections, what the impeachment scam is all about.

It’s unclear how Republicans will respond to their strategy. If numbers in both houses up for reelection in close races fear possible defeat by supporting Trump’s retention in office, they might jump ship to boost their own reelection chances.

At this stage, how things may or may not play out is pure speculation. Most often, politicians do what it takes to stay in office.

Ukrainegate is no more credible than Russiagate, what Trump’s legal team should be able to use to his advantage.

Targeting him over dealings with Ukrainian President Zelensky is a hurdle his legal team should be able to overcome.

The wildcard is whether he’s able to retain enough GOP Senate support to prevent Dems from getting a super-majority of voting members present to remove him.

What never happened before is unlikely ahead but clearly possible.

The impeachment train left the station. Will it be derailed before reaching its destination or be able to remove a sitting president for the first time in US history?

John Adams once said it would take a national convulsion to do it. No doubt, hardcore Trump supporters would be enraged.

How removing him from office, if happens, might affect 2020 presidential and congressional elections is a big unknown.

It could backfire on Dems instead of helping them. Nothing is certain. The fullness of time will tell what’s impossible to know now for sure now.

A Final Comment

If removed from office, consider who’ll replace him. Elevating evangelical fundamentalist, neocon hardliner, white supremacist, imperial war cheerleader, Islamophobe, Russophobe and homophobe, hostile to unwanted aliens, people of color, equity and justice Pence could make diehard Trump haters yearn for his return.


Note to readers: please click the share buttons below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Award-winning author Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected]. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)

His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

Visit his blog site at

Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Articles by: Stephen Lendman

About the author:

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected] His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III." Visit his blog site at Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected] contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]