Historic Rwanda Genocide Trial in France

France: some twenty years after Paul Kagame’s U.S. supported invasion of Rwanda resulted in genocide, the UN’s International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) with 95 indictments (exclusively of Black Africans) since 1994, is being phased out.

On February 4th France under its laws of universal jurisdiction charged Pascal Simbikangwa with complicity in genocide. Referred to in press accounts as Rwanda’s intelligence chief during the genocide, the plaintiff denies the charges against him.

The trial has the public approval of Rwanda’s Minister of Justice who finds “history being made”(AFP). The Guardian (U.K.) suggests that the two months of expected proceedings will reveal the Mitterrand government’s complicity in the Rwandan genocide.

Press accounts concerning Rwanda consistently fail to note that Kagame’s minority Tutsi military takeover of France’s former colony led to foreseeable military and popular resistance by the country’s Hutu majority, and mass murders of Rwandan Tutsis.

Trials focusing on the interface of individual perpetrators of hatred and horror deflect attention from the dynamics of an international military takeover with predictable results. They also allow the courts to focus publicly and exclusively on the guilt of Africans, introduced to the concept of genocide by Europe’s colonialism.

What was identified by UN General Dallaire’s accounts as a “third force,” both alien to the conflict’s norms and crucial to understanding the genocide, remains omitted in global media accounts.

Also omitted and denied official recognition are the Hutu population groups slaughtered in genocidal proportions during the Kagame invasion (previous). When American attorney Peter Erlinger clarified an equivalent genocide of Hutu peoples (ie. previous) he was arrested and imprisoned by the Kagame government, released on compassionate grounds to return to the U.S. under threat of extradition and prosecution.

Victoire Ingabire, attempting to stand as a presidential candidate, was arrested, tried, convicted, after asking equivalent respect for Hutu deaths denied their country’s recognition. She serves 15 years in prison. Kagame is also considered responsible for a huge number of deaths of Hutu exiled in the Congo (previous).

Within a pattern of murdered political opposition President Kagame’s former intelligence chief Patrick Karegeya who accused Kagame of ordering the Rwanda’s President Juvenal Habyarimana’s plane be shot down (previous and see also Dr. Theogene Rudasingwa) – the triggering of Rwanda’s bloodshed – was found murdered in Johannesburg exile, Jan.1, 2014. The AP notes 27 other possible cases concerned with the genocide in Rwanda awaiting trial under French law.

In 2014 France provides an ambiguous venue, with its government vulnerable to the Convention on Genocide domestically for its ongoing treatment of Roma peoples, and equally vulnerable for its foreign policy/actions in Cote d’Ivoire, Libya, Syria, Central African Republic. Unlike the ICTR cases which remained largely unknown to the general public, a genocide “show trial” of a black foreigner preceding French elections in the Spring (36,000 mayors), raises questions of political favour in votes from increasingly racist, xenophobic corporate populism. Historically, the need for this trial may be understood as a distress call.

Partial sources online:

“France to open Rwanda genocide trial,”Feb. 4, 2014, Al Jazeera;

“France holds up mirror in Rwanda genocide trial,” Jamey Keaton, Feb. 3, 2014, Bloomberg Businessweek;

“France holds up mirror in Rwanda genocide trial,” AP, Feb. 4, 2014, Omaha.com;

“France’s role in Rwandan genocide exposed in trial,” Linda Melvern (Guardian News Service), Feb. 6, 2014, The Hindu;

“Ex-Rwandan spy ‘was on hit list’,” Alexander Joe (AFP), Jan. 6, 2014, The Daily Telegraph;

“Landmark Rwandan genocide trial opens in France,” Agence France-Press, Feb. 4, 2014, The Raw Story.

Articles by: J. B. Gerald

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]