Elections and “Democracy” in the Netherlands


Dutch voters will elect a new parliament on Wednesday, 12 September. Since well over a month, aided by state television and the compliant corporate-controlled media, politicians of the main parties have been trying to attract the attention of the voting public.

As usual, there have been televised debates, lengthy interviews, learned analyses by pundits and gurus, various daily polls. Clearly, spin doctors and PR agencies have been having a field day. The main candidates have produced an avalanche of promises, while at the same time stressing that the time has come for austerity and that, yes, sacrifices must be made.

However, the election circus has largely obscured the naked truth: there are no real issues at stake. Indeed, how can there be any issues, when well over 80% of legislation, rules and regulations are being made by unelected officials in foreign capitals? Actually, the European Commission at Brussels dictates economic policy, farming policy and social policy, and sets guidelines for security and legal matters. The EU issues over 30.000 rules and regulations each year, ranging from prohibitions to sell alternative medicines to defining for how long drivers are allowed to drive their trucks. Monetary policy is in the hands of the European Central Bank at Frankfurt. Defense and foreign policy are determined by NATO (conveniently headquartered at Brussels), which is really an imperial instrument wielded by the boss of the US empire, residing not like Nero in the Golden House, but in the White House.

The political system in the Netherlands is anything but a democracy. Even ancient Athens, where only adult male citizens were enfranchised, was more democratic than the Netherlands today. Unfortunately, the Netherlands is not the only country in Europe that undeservedly calls itself a democracy. As a matter of fact, probably only Iceland is a true democracy: there at least the will of the majority is respected. Everywhere else in US-controlled Europe, democracy has become totally devoid of meaning.

In spite of the complete absence of genuine issues, witnessing the elections in the Netherlands actually may be instructive for the insight they provide. They have a certain Latin American flavor, which is hardly surprising since, like many Latin American nations, especially the smaller ones, the Netherlands is ruled by a venal elite (fully subservient to corporate interests) that acts as an intermediary for the US empire. As a matter of fact, the Netherlands is sometimes referred to as a banana monarchy. Like most of Europe, the Netherlands is a de facto US protectorate, no different from Cuba from 1902 to 1958.

The half dozen major parties in the Netherlands are firmly committed to maintaining the dependent relationship with the US. This means the Netherlands will continue to participate in US military and colonial adventures. It also entails bowing to the wishes of big corporations and banks and putting the resources of the state at their disposal, in line with the prevailing neoliberal gospel. Since public discontent with the government is mounting, the Dutch government will at the same time have to do away with what little remains of civic freedoms.

The liberal democratic VVD party has led the way towards finalizing the transformation into a full-blown police state, with the creation of a ‘Ministry of State Security and Justice.’ The self-styled ‘progressive’ liberal democrats (D’66) are notorious for supplying an endless number of mediocre opportunists occupying the intermediate ranks of ministries and the judiciary. Like their counterparts in Europe, the Dutch social democratic Labour party (PvdA), traditionally the pro-US fifth column, has systematically betrayed its working class support base by embracing Chicago School neoliberalism. Their friends from GroenLinks (‘green left’), with their ecological and pacifist roots, have muted into a party supporting NATO aggression in Afghanistan.

The Christian Democratic CDA party, once a main support of the postwar political arrangement, has steadily been losing voter support and no longer plays a central role. Seemingly, there are only two parties that challenge the system. One is the right wing PVV, with close links to the Israeli embassy at The Hague and supported by lavish donations from US Jewish foundations. The other is the SP (‘Socialist Party’), that maintains a radical posture but is in fact very moderate and actually helps to keep the system in place.

There is only only conclusion to make: the form of government in the Netherlands should be called corporatism.  There is no major party that fundamentally questions the prevailing political and economic arrangement and that offers a true alternative.

Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Articles by: Hans Vogel

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]