Election Violence: Extrajudicial assassinations in the Philippines

Poll-related violence in Philippines fostered by culture of impunity — Beltran

MANILA — Anakpawis Representative and political detainee Crispin Beltran today said that the worsening election-related violence in the country is related to the seemingly endless spate of extra-judicial killings targeting political activists and human rights advocates.

He said that that the Macapagal-Arroyo administration deliberate failure to put and end to the killings of members and officials of the progressive party-lists and militant people’s organizations has created a culture of impunity which is now being taken full advantage of by hired guns of traditional politicians. He said that the government’s failure to solve the killings of activists serve to encourage hired killers to peddle their trade with less worry and fear that they will be apprehended and brought to justice.

“It’s a culture and atmosphere of impunity that’s being fostered in the Philippines, and at the core of this is the Arroyo government’s failure to apprehend the killers of activists and journalists. Criminals and assassins have become even more bold in carrying out their bloody and mercenary missions because they are confident that the Philippine National Police (PNP) is essentially clueless when it comes to finding killers and solving crimes of extrajudicial killings,” he said.

“The Philippines’ peace and order situation is also rapidly deteriorating along with the plight of civil, political and human rights. Hired killers are running amok and taking advantage of the government’s lame duck stance when it comes to going after shoot and run criminals,” he added.

Dismantle private armies, monitor security teams of rival political camps

The activist lawmaker said that instead of dismantling the private armies and mercenary gangs being kept and maintained by certain politicians in the provinces, the Macapagal-Arroyo government continues to go after civilians sympathetic to the progressive party-lists by militarizing the urban centers. He said that the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Philippine National Police (PNP) should be conducting bilateral campaigns to weed out, disarm and dismantle the private armies of big landlords and politicians.

“What has happened to the Commission on Election’s gun ban? It has allowed so many exemptions this election season that the security agents of most politicians and candidates are walking around carrying a regular armory with them,” he said.

He also expressed criticism for Malacanang’s attempts to downplay election-related violence. He said that the prevalence of violence during this campaign season give lie to the assertions of the administration that it has the peace and order situation under control and that the May 14 polls will go without a hitch.

“This is where the help of the military is needed. The AFP is more suited to monitoring the actions of politicians private armies and the rivalries between political dynasties instead of conducting their supposed clean elections awareness campaign seminars. They should direct their armed expertise towards going after the private armies and security teams of politicians where election rivalry and competition is heated, particularly in the provinces,” he concluded. 

Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research

Articles by: Global Research

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]