Speaking out against the mRNA “Vaccine”: Dr Sam White’s Legal Victory against the UK General Medical Council– And the Gutter Media Response

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

 

 

 

Dr Sam White has shown the way to all other medical practitioners with a massive legal win over the corrupted General Medical Council. To achieve this he had to resign first. Let there be no mistake – what he did in the self-sacrifices he made, he did for everyone.

Dr White’s gift to the medical profession is akin to what Oskar Schindler did for German Jews during that holocaust. White is a hero. He will go down in history as a hero – providing those currently controlling everything you see on mainstream media don’t get to write that history.

Trials are coming. They are coming soon. Make sure you are on the right side of history – especially if you are a medical practitioner.

Dr Sam White’s trial

Dr. Sam White’s trial was about freedom of speech. Anyone with gumption knows speaking out about the fake pandemic can be costly in terms of career and social acceptability in an environment where peer-group pressure to go along with the narrative has become the norm. Gumption is used in both its meanings, that is, of commonsense and of courage. Dr. White has these gifts in abundance.

Sadly, many medical practices have chosen the “love of money” route, and prescribed potentially life-threatening and life-changing gene-therapies that are “all-evil” without providing the necessary information for patients to make informed consent choices. Under doctors’ “do no harm” pledge it makes them culpable. Medical practices have become tools of an administrative system which has bribed otherwise decent doctors and nurses in order to boost their incomes, give them more free time and release them from one-to-one patient-doctor consultations.

Most of them know this. No doubt many are happy with their newly-found freedoms and money. There will, however, be those whose conscience is pricking, who are aware that patient-care afforded before the fake pandemic, has all but gone. These are likely to be looking for a way out as the indoctrinated populace is starting to wake up to the scam.

To be effective these doctors need to group together. In force they can turn it around and get us all back to normal – and the sooner the better. They know they have not seen a pandemic. They know the hospitals are half-empty, apart from “vaccine-damaged” individuals labelled as Covid-19 victims. They must also know, because even I know, that people injected with the toxic jabs are being called “unvaccinated” should harmful events occur within a fortnight after the jab – and that’s the period during which most harmful events from injections take place.

What happened?

A summary of Dr. Sam White’s recent history shows that he chose not be a part of the fake medical advice instructing people to go around in masks. He considered this measure to be dangerous, as he did the programme to jab everyone.

“Because of the lies” he resigned as partner in a medical practice after being a practising doctor since 2004. He called the jabs “genetic manipulation” since they are not traditional vaccines but contain a code for the spike protein which appears to be making people “really sick”. He was also critical of use of the PCR test to diagnose Covid-19 which convinced him that it was all a fraud. All very rational.

He resigned in February 2021 and notice expired in June 2021. After that Dr White went public with a video about the danger of masks and the unsafe roll-out of “vaccines”. It very quickly amassed viewings of over a million prompting the NHS, instead of answering his claims, to question his mental health. Dr. Sam wrote an open letter critical of the criminal conduct of those heading the GMC. He was brought before a tribunal on 17 August, but despite a 124 paragraph rebuttal that all of his statements were valid, he was banned from commenting about clinical issues on social media.

In retrospect that was where the GMC made their biggest mistake. They breached his human right to freedom of expression. The chief executive and registrar of the GMC, Charlie Massey, had personally conducted this attack on Dr White’s liberty and should now be compelled to resign. While Sam White’s freedom of speech has, through this judgment, been restored – and cannot be challenged – his right to practice as a doctor can still be taken to a higher court.

Dr. White has done all doctors a huge favour with his victory over the GMC – which in my opinion – like the MRHA – is not fit for purpose. Although Dr. White went out on a limb he did not achieve this victory alone. He had a good legal team behind him, a team which believed in him. Surprisingly, they were not a medical law firm.

Philip Hyland is an employment law solicitor, while the barrister, Francis Hoar, specialises in election, public, commercial and employment law. This doughty team have now opened the door for other law-firms – who like the medics appear to be reluctant to put their jobs on the line.

Hyland is a laid-back and thoughtful man who measures his words very carefully. Of the victory over the GMC he says, that it:

“should enable doctors to speak up about what is happening in hospitals”

Sam White’s legal team are being inundated with “vaccine-damaged” and “vaccine-murder” cases, or potential cases. Sadly, it is not possible for one firm to take on every case – there being so many. Where are the other firms? Are they saluting and “heiling” the establishment while the Schindlers in this new war get on with the job in hand? Surely legal firms would like to return to normal too. Or would they?

Plaintiffs not provided with “informed consent” are advised to follow legal procedures themselves and take out a civil action if they cannot find a firm to do it for them. And it is important that individuals do take action if they, or those they care for, have been damaged by the gene therapies. General practitioners should have warned them of the hazards of untested and unlicensed injections beforehand. If they did not they too are liable under the law.

What Philip Hyland also suggests is that the doctor-patient role has been reversed of late. He spells out the patient’s right to decide on treatment, even when the medical evidence of efficacy seems overwhelming. The patient has the right to choose. That is why employers demanding vaccination of employees are also at risk of future actions against them.

Doctors today, says Mr Hyland, see themselves as having the upper-hand in the treatment of their patients. That is not true. The patient has that right. The patient has always had that right. Though it is a doctor’s duty to make sure the patient is informed of all risks.

MSM guttersniping

After resigning and gaining new-found popularity on social media Dr White embarked on a lonely journey of exposing the truth about what is happening. Mainstream media, owned by those who wish to control everything and everybody, were taking pot-shots at him. In a regional article the BBC went on a main thrust. Using evocative words in its heading the BBC made readers think of Dr. White as being a “misinformation” doctor. It further endorsed this with a sub-heading that his views “Echoed conspiracy theories”. The BBC bias was firmly in the GMC camp – and may even have verged on trying to influence the judgment.

Sally Beck in The Conservative Woman sprang to Dr White’s defence, here and here with a link to his letter to the chief executive of the NHS, Sir Simon Stevens, here. Otherwise Dr. Sam White was pretty much alone through his ordeal with the exception of his legal team, and supportive medics, some of high renown, and new media sites like Bitchute who have given him a platform and also spoken out about the big Covid lie.

After his victory the same BBC, in fairness, gave a balanced and factual report, but again only at regional level. This “fake pandemic”, bear in mind, is all over the world. Do you get the impression there are those who do not want the truth to be spread far and wide?

Yesterday Dr. White took part in broadcast about his victory. He was interviewed by Patrick Christys together with the butting-in bully of constant interruption, Jon Gaunt. Unsurprisingly, smug pro-vaxxer, Gaunt added this clip to his own Twitter account with the message: ‘Oh dear someone forgot to turn their WhatsApp off! This is very funny.’

No, Jon Gaunt, it is not funny at all, and the police have been informed.

As the bully was not butting-in at the time the message appeared, he’s my number one suspect. Did he know it was going to appear?

Anyway, had this fantasy fabrication not occurred the interview would never have been given coverage by MSM.

In a cavalcade of stenography, the sensationalist MSM: Daily Mail, Sun, Metro, Mirror, et al, picked up on this message added by an unknown individual, or individuals. The reason it appeared can only be guessed. Was it to cast doubt on Dr. White’s credentials rather than concentrate on the main points of his legal victory? Was it to stop people learning the truth about the hoax pandemic which threatens to bring the country, even the world, to its knees? Was it to throw Dr. White off track? Whatever the reason it says much more about the press than it does about a good man who has the health concerns of a nation at heart.

Dr. Sam White is now practising as a holistic practitioner, helping among others the “vaccine-damaged”.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, @crg_globalresearch. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

John Goss is a former toolmaker and technical author with a degree in international relations and a Master of Letters (MLitt).

Featured image is from https://www.drsamwhite.com/about


Articles by: John Goss

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]