Brexit Plan: At Best ‘Chaotic And Dysfunctional’, Turning Into National Scandal

Region:

There is a feeling that somehow a doctrine of ministerial accountability is in fact, somehow real, whist in reality it is a myth. Ministers resign over scandals involving rent-boys, expenses fraud and gaffes over racism and the like, but very rarely over policy failure, often ending with huge financial losses big enough to bankrupt large private companies.

Both Labour and Tory in the last few decades have left a litany of failed projects costing hundreds of billions with absolutely no accountability whatsoever. From Britain’s disastrous adventure into the ‘ERM’, a Poll Tax that brought down Thatcher, the absolute failure of the Child Support Agency, the scandal and mis-selling of the SERPS pension scheme to countless failed technology projects from the benefits agencies to the NHS. Government has proven one thing with a high degree of consistency, it’s incompetence on the big projects knows no bounds.

I have said for years that Britain’s really big areas of social expenditure should be taken out of the hands of politician’s. They are too corrupt and too incompetent to manage them. Education and health are two that spring immediately to mind.

But now we have a really, really big issue that needs the most highly skilled individuals the country can muster. Brexit will affect all citizens not just for the decades ahead but for Britain’s future forever. Britain stands on the cusp of an historic opportunity. When the European Union fails, and it will, diplomats and ambassadors from all over the continent will be queuing at the doors of No10 for advice – if, and only if, our political leaders can get theirs heads around a successful Brexit plan. Alas, I fear, they are as clueless about what to do as their advisors, who are also clueless.

A leaked memo from consultancy firm Deloitte states that the government has no overall Brexit plan. The FT reported that: “The memo, dated November 7, said that “divisions within the cabinet” were bedevilling Brexit preparations and that officials in different departments were being asked to work on 500 separate related projects.”

Downing Street officials have tried their best to deny the ‘advisors’ advice. “It does seem this is a firm touting for business, aided by the media,” a spokeswoman said. The author had not “been in Number 10 or engaged with officials in Number 10 since the prime minister took office.”

Deloitte hastily then issued an apology. “This was a note intended primarily for internal audiences.” One has to say, that being the case, Deloitte have no confidence in Theresa May’s position that there is indeed a plan. The memo does not look like a document for ‘internal audiences’.

The memo describes divisions between Philip Hammond, the chancellor, and Brexit advocates such as our new foreign secretary Boris Johnson as well as international trade secretary Liam Fox, according to a report in The Times newspaper. Clearly, this means that even if there was a plan, key managers of the plan have not bought in to it and can’t agree. It also means Deloitte do have an inside track on the matter, how else would they be able to comment with such authority.

The Deloitte document makes reference to the fact that Theresa May’s personal management of the Brexit plan is ‘unsustainable’.

Five months after the EU referendum, Brexit preparations appear to be “chaotic and dysfunctional” and Whitehall does not have the capacity to deliver it, according a leading think tank reported by SkyNews (note: Murdoch is very pro-Brexit).

The Institute for Government report attacks Theresa May’s “secretive approach”, claiming it is hampering preparations and that “silence is not a strategy”. It warns that while the civil service has the technical skills to deliver Brexit, it simply does not have the capability to do so.

Accusations of ‘dereliction of duty‘ emerge and we are even hearing that RBS Chairman is warning that banks may leave Britain if no agreed plan is forthcoming. One could have an opinion on whether seeing the banks leave would be a good thing but the point is that with no Brexit plan, business does not know what to plan for and therefore might plan for something else to ensure damage limitation to their profit models.

In any event, it’s clear there’s no coherant plan, otherwise government posture on the matter would be much more confident, which it isn’t. And Theresa May does not have a good history of managing projects successfully either. The Guardian wrote about her performance as Home secretary “Her six years at the Home Office were marked by an instinctive secrecy, a talent for “going missing” or delegating when things went wrong.” It continues to say that “Her capacity to make herself scarce at key moments of political danger peaked during the referendum campaign. Her minimal public contribution not only failed to defend her record on immigration but instead focused on her personal pledge to withdraw from the European convention on human rights to demonstrate that she was a wafer-thin remained.”

In the meantime, Deloitte LLP got a record fine just last week for misconduct after the accounting regulator said the audit and financial statements they reported for a particular company fell short of acceptable standards and were subsequently fined (with their partners) £4million. The fine is the highest imposed by the FRC for misconduct.

The government has a shameful record of failure when it comes to delivering anything remotely that of large scale projects. Brexit is huge and everyone should have every confidence they will make a mess of it.


Articles by: Graham Vanbergen

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]