Bill Written by Citibank Lobbyists Gets Banksters Back in High-Risk Derivatives Business – American Taxpayer to Pay for Losses

In late October, the House passed a “bipartisan tweak” to the Dodd-Frank bill Congress earlier passed off as “reform” after the banksters nearly crashed the financial system in 2008.

H.R. 992, the Swaps Regulatory Improvement Act, authored primarily by Citibank lobbyists, will allow predatory Wall Street financial institutions to once again engage in high-risk derivatives trading. Losses will be socialized and paid for by the American taxpayer through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or FDIC.

“Citigroup’s recommendations were reflected in more than 70 lines of the House committee’s 85-line bill,” Eric Lipton and Ben Protess wrote for the New York Times. “Two crucial paragraphs, prepared by Citigroup in conjunction with other Wall Street banks, were copied nearly word for word.”

Co-sponsors of the bill are on the Citibank payroll. They received nearly 17 times more money from the bank than have members of the House who have not signed on as co-sponsors, according to Forbes. “Citigroup has given $503,150 to current members of the House of Representatives,” writes Tom Groenfeldt. “Representative Jim Himes, D-Conn., has received $66,450 from Citigroup, more than any other member of the House of Representatives. Himes is a co-sponsor of the bill.”

Wall Street lobbyists targeted House Democrats. 70 of them came out in support of the bill. Only two Republicans voted thumbs down. They were washed away by overwhelming support for bankster criminality.

According to the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Representative Jeb Hensarling, a Republican from Texas, the Dodd-Frank bill revamp will fix the economy. “America’s economy remains stuck in the slowest, weakest nonrecovery recovery of all times,” he said on October 30. “Those who create jobs for America are drowning in a sea of red tape preventing them.”

Hensarling didn’t explain how allowing large banks to play high-stakes blackjack and then force a beleaguered American taxpayer pick up billions in losses will create jobs.

Left to their own devices, banksters will create new “unusual or exigent circumstances” Frank-Dodd was supposedly passed to address. Bank lobbyists have successfully rolled back sections of Frank-Dodd and are now working feverishly to institute a return of the heyday of unencumbered derivatives criminality.

Congress is a wholly owned subsidiary of the bankers and the global elite. The so-called Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act signed into law by Obama in 2010 was largely devised as a propaganda device to placate Americans outraged by the “too big to fail” bail-out swindle.

Not surprisingly, Dodd-Frank has been left to twist in the wind. As of June, 175 of 279 passed Dodd-Frank deadlines have been missed. Government regulators have neglected 70.1 percent of rulemaking deadlines and 99.6 percent of 280 rules with specified deadlines, according to Bank Credit News.

Frank-Dodd was never a serious attempt to “reform” bankster financial institutions. Citibank and the money mobsters have paid off Congress. In turn Congress has given the Mafia dens up and down Wall Street a wink and a nod. No significant reform will be forthcoming.

Articles by: Kurt Nimmo

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected] contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]