Turkey and the Middle East: The Reshaping of Regional Relations

Turkey and the Middle East: The Reshaping of Regional Relations

Recent initiatives by its government attest to Turkey’s determination to bring a new realism to world politics, and events in the Arab world provide an opportunity to reshape regional relations,

As Turkey gears up to parliamentary elections in June, recent pronouncements by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu confirmed the importance that the Turkish leadership places in defining a more dynamic role for Turkey in the Middle East as a bridge between East and West.

The Leaders of Change summit 13-14 March in Istanbul brought together a hundred political leaders, academics and journalists primarily from the US, Europe and the Middle East. The summit was opened by the Turkish prime minister, who referred to Turkey as a “democratic social state based on social justice”, and described Istanbul as the right place for East-West meetings, with its long history of ties to the Middle East, the Balkans, North Africa, and as a crossroads of Christianity, Islam and Judaism. His address complemented the words of his foreign minister addressed to the summit: “Islam and democracy are side by side” now, and Turkish entry into the European Union will show that “Europe can have a Muslim country.”

Erdogan chastised the West for its reluctance to support the recent indigenous uprisings in the Middle East, and at the same time warned against the mistake of invading Libya as it invaded Iraq, saying that this would destroy any hope for democracy. A strong leader himself, he argued that if a leader falls behind, becomes merely a “ruler trying to resist change” and uses his position to enrich himself, he will be reviled and will fall. The state “lives” only in as much as the people live; there is no chicken-and-egg problem here. If there is to be regime change in Libya, it must come from the people, not the West.

The Turkish prime minister’s vision is to dismantle borders, so that people can pass from Europe to the Middle East and vice versa, pointing to Turkey’s abolition of visa requirements to dozens of countries, including Egypt and Russia — unlike the insular EU. This is a long term vision of Erdogan, who co-sponsored the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations along with Spanish President José Zapatero in 2005.

The “end of history” proposed by Francis Fukuyama after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the “clash of civilisations” proposed by Samuel Huntington were dismissed by the prime minister as Euro-centric and discredited by recent events in the Middle East. He also dismissed the Euro-centrism of the war on terror. “Terrorism is international” including “Madrid, Moscow and Istanbul” You can’t say “My terrorist is bad, yours is good,” a principle that “certain countries” operate on. The flow of ideas cannot be one-way. “We must share ideas to overcome problems.”

The prime minister is already looking towards Turkey’s centenary celebrations in 2023, and vowed at the Leaders of Change summit that Turkey would be among the top 10 economies by then. Deputy Prime Minister Hayati Yazici further spoke about the strong Turkish economy at the summit, claiming that Turkey’s strong economy has raised living standards to the point that “no Turkish citizen is among the world’s 1.5 billion people who must survive on less than a dollar a day or the 1 billion who lack adequate drinking water.”

Foreign Minister Davutoglu arrived at the summit straight from the sixth Al-Jazeera Forum “The Arab world in transition: Has the future arrived? “ in Doha, Qatar 12-14 March, where he spoke at length about the Turkish vision for the Middle East. Davutoglu noted there that “The wave of revolutions in the Arab world was spontaneous. But it also had to happen to restore the natural flow of history”.

He condemned the colonial divide-and-conquer policies of the 1930s-50s, carving up the Middle East and cutting the organic relations of Arab countries, and the subsequent Cold War, which distorted and weakened the region and turned nations like Turkey and Syria, which had lived together for centuries, into enemies. We are not witnesses of the end of history, but, on the contrary, the return of the Middle East to “the normal course of history” after a century of distortion, when ancient civilisations were torn apart by the invaders.

The foreign minister holds a PhD degree in Political Science and International Relations and was chairman of the Department of International Relations at Beykent University in Istanbul before entering the political arena. He is the author of five books, including Alternative Paradigms: The Impact of Islamic and Western Weltanschauungs on Political Theory and The Civilizational Transformation and The Muslim World, which have been published in English.

The end of the Cold War, the “earthquake of 1989”, should have brought the Turkish and Arab peoples back to their “natural” relations, but the West prevented this, he told the Leaders of Change summit. The West believed that “Arab societies didn’t deserve democracy, and needed authoritarian regimes to preserve the status quo and prevent Islamist radicalism.”

Davutoglu rejects this scenario and points to the uprisings in the Arab world as proof that, “An ordinary Turk, an ordinary Arab, an ordinary Tunisian can change history,” stating that the peoples who lived under the pre-colonial Ottoman rule “have a common destiny”. “We need to reconstruct and restore the political systems in our region, just as we would rebuild our houses after a tsunami.” The implication is that the tsunamis that destroyed the region are colonialism and Israel, and that the latter must become part of the region’s common destiny.

His vision is based on recognition of “respect and dignity” for the people of the region, an end to the insults and humiliation. “That is what the young people in Tahrir Square demanded. After listening to them, I became much more optimistic for the future. That generation is the future of Egypt. They know what they want. This is a new momentum in our region, and it should be respected.”

Change is happening whether the leaders want it or not, and requires that leaders lead the change or they will become followers. “Nobody should argue that only a particular regime or person can guarantee a country’s stability. The only guarantee of stability is the people. We must become subjects of change, like the people in Tahrir Square.”

No dictators can guarantee security – “security and freedom are not alternatives; we need both.” The only way forward is through “transparency, accountability, human rights and the rule of law.” Davutoglu, clearly reflecting on Turkey’s experience, warned that there must be a “clear separation between the military and civilian roles of the political institutions” and commended Egyptian head of state Field Marshall Tantawi’s decision to transfer power to a civilian government as soon as possible.

He stressed that “the territorial integrity of our countries and the region must be protected. The legal status and territorial integrity of states including Libya and Yemen should be protected. During colonialism and cold war we had enough divisions, enough separations.”

“Turkey understands the region better than others precisely because it is part of the region,” but the people of each country must lead the way. “There should be regional ownership. This is our region.” However, like his prime minister, he stressed that Turkey was not necessarily a model for any country, that “change depends on both individual cultures and universal values”. He seconded Yazici’s claim that “Totalitarian regimes not based on social legitimacy have no place since the fall of the Berlin Wall.”

Davutolgu criticised the term “Middle East” as an Orientalist term, connoting conflicts and underdevelopment. “But our region has been the centre of civilisation for millennia in which multicultural environments flourish,” and there are “sufficient economic resources today to make our region a global centre of gravity”.

The foreign minister urged his listeners to seize the day, to use the new openness in the region to reject violence and dismantle “barriers between countries, societies and sects”. To increase economic interdependency, political dialogue and cultural interaction. Just as visa walls are coming down between Turkey and its neighbours, so Turkey has opened 18 new embassies in Africa in the past decade, even as European countries shut theirs down. Davutoglu endorsed Erdogan’s call to eliminate visas, envisioning a day “when people can pass from a free Palestine through Istanbul to London. That’s our vision. Not building walls around Turkey, but opening up to share with our neighbours. In Cairo, we are the Middle East, in Europe we are Europeans. We must shape history with all the nations around us.”

He added that this applies to the West too, that following the international financial crisis of the past three years, “we need to develop an economic order based on justice, and a social order based on respect and dignity.” Middle East developments today hold out the promise of showing the way towards a “global, political, economic and cultural new order”.

Eric Walberg writes for Al-Ahram Weekly http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/ You can reach him at http://ericwalberg.com/


Articles by: Eric Walberg

About the author:

Canadian Eric Walberg is known worldwide as a journalist specializing in the Middle East, Central Asia and Russia. A graduate of University of Toronto and Cambridge in economics, he has been writing on East-West relations since the 1980s. He has lived in both the Soviet Union and Russia, and then Uzbekistan, as a UN adviser, writer, translator and lecturer. Presently a writer for the foremost Cairo newspaper, Al Ahram, he is also a regular contributor to Counterpunch, Dissident Voice, Global Research, Al-Jazeerah and Turkish Weekly, and is a commentator on Voice of the Cape radio. Eric Walberg was a moderator and speaker at the Leaders for Change Summit in Istanbul in 2011.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]