Ten Killed by Police At African Barrick Gold Mining Operations in Tanzania

Woman panning for gold at North Mara. Photo: Plenty’s Paradox. Used under Creative Commons license.

As many as 10 people have been killed by police this year at African Barrick Gold’s operations in Tanzania, according to a new report from two NGOs – MiningWatch Canada and Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID) in the UK.

The North Mara gold mine in northern Tanzania is located in an area where some 70,000 Kuria people live in seven villages not far from the Kenyan border. Most of the villagers are very poor and thousands make a living by bribing local police and security officials at the mine to allow them to scavenge for gold flakes in the waste dumps. (The practice of small scale mining has been taking place for years even before Barrick began mining operations)

The new deaths were revealed almost 18 months after Leigh Day, a UK law firm, filed a lawsuit against the company on March 28, 2013, in the High Court of England and Wales on behalf of the the families of six men who were killed at the mine and a seventh who was left paraplegic. The lawsuit was filed against UK-based African Barrick, which is a subsidiary of Barrick Gold, a Canadian company.

MiningWatch Canada and RAID say they interviewed over 30 victims and their family members between June and July of this year. “Most of them had been shot by police or assaulted by the mine’s own security guards within the last five years,” says Catherine Coumans of MiningWatch Canada.

“We are deeply concerned not only about the clear patterns we discern in the excessive use of force at the mine, but also about the intimidation, persecution, and invasion of privacy suffered by victims and their families in the aftermath of violence by mine security,” Patricia Feeney of RAID said in a press statement.

“The numbers who have been shot and injured on the mine is just extraordinary,” Shanta Martin, a partner at Leigh Day, told the Guardian. newspaper. “In 2014 we should be sending the message to all that there is no place to hide if you violate human rights.”

Barrick told the Globe and Mail newspaper in Canada that the number of deaths does “correspond with incidents reported to the mine.” The company insists however that they are not sure if the deaths are a result of accidents or infighting among the people searching for gold.

The company says it has begun $15 million worth of community projects to help the villagers and is constructing a three-metre-high (ten-foot-high) concrete wall that stretches 14 kilometers (9 miles) around the mine to keep scavengers out and reduce the violence. Barrick also says it has provided training to the Tanzanian police on “international standards” of human rights.

However the activists say that despite the claims of helping the community, the company has also tried to sabotage the legal proceedings. “Out of the blue, our clients were served with legal papers on their doorstep,” says Richard Meeran from Leigh Day, who is representing the villagers. ““These papers demanded our clients appear in a Dar es Salaam court, which is over 1200 kilometres and a two-day bus ride away from where they live. This was a pre-emptive legal strike by this very powerful company to try and obtain an unfair advantage over our clients.”

Last December Justice Green, the UK judge, overseeing the case, ordered Barrick to withdraw the Tanzanian counter suits.

Meanwhile the international media attention has galvanized Tanzanian officials to come out against the excesses. Ernest Mangu, Inspector General of Police told the media that “strong disciplinary measures  would be taken against any police officers engaging in unethical practices when assigned to guard  the mine” while Mathias Chikawe, Tanzanian home affairs minister “declared zero tolerance against unethical police officers.”


Articles by: Richard Smallteacher

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]