Netanyahu: Palestine Vote at UN ‘Meaningless’

Netanyahu opposes Palestinian statehood in favor of a Greater Israel

In-depth Report:
palestine UN

Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu said the UN General Assembly vote implicitly recognizing Palestine as a state was “meaningless” and will do nothing to realize actual statehood.

The United Nations General Assembly on Thursday voted overwhelmingly in favor of a resolution upgrading Palestine to a “non-member observer state,” from a “non-member observer entity.” The upgraded status could make it easier for the Palestinians to bring Israel to trial for war crimes at the International Criminal Court.

Israel, and of course the US – along with 7 other marginal outliers, had fiercely opposed the Palestinian bid, but it passed anyways in a 138-9 vote, with 41 abstentions.

“This is a meaningless resolution that won’t change anything on the ground. No Palestinian state will arise without an arrangement ensuring the security of Israeli citizens,” Netanyahu said in a statement on Thursday.

What he meant by this was that no Palestinian state will ever arise, so long as Israel has anything to do about it. The Israeli leadership, especially Netanyahu and his right-wing Likud Party, dreams of a Greater Israel with full sovereignty over the territories currently recognized as Palestinian in the West Bank and Gaza.

“The way to peace between Jerusalem and Ramallah is through direct negotiations without preconditions, not unilateral decisions at the  UN,” Netanyahu added.

But unilateral is a funny way to describe a resolution that is in accord with an overwhelming international consensus. And anyways, the establishment of the Israeli state after WWII was exactly the kind of UN-authorized unilateral action Netanyahu now supposedly derides for Palestine.

Netanyahu also said any political settlement needs to come from direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. But Israel has derailed those negotiations by continuing illegal settlement expansion in the West Bank. Decades of the defunct peace process has revealed it to be merely a scheme to provide Israel with more time to colonize additional Palestinian land.

Articles by: John Glaser

Related Global Research Articles:

  • Is Political Zionism Another Form of Ideological Fundamentalism?Is Political Zionism Another Form of Ideological Fundamentalism?

    The Political Zionist doctrine of the Netanyahu government that claims the whole of former Palestine as being a 'gift from God' is essentially ideological fundamentalism i.e. a ritualistic reading of scripture and a reliance upon dogma - a position also known as 'extremism'. It is […]
  • Israeli Attack on Gaza Was “Massive State Terror”: Former UN Official Richard FalkIsraeli Attack on Gaza Was “Massive State Terror”: Former UN Official Richard Falk

    As a brutal winter storm hits Gaza, where tens of thousands of Palestinians remain without proper shelter after Israel’s summer attacks, a former United Nations official warns of a “humanitarian emergency of the highest order.” “The evidence seems overwhelming as to the commission of […]
  • Israel Moves Quickly to Exploit Paris AttacksIsrael Moves Quickly to Exploit Paris Attacks

    After hesitations reportedly over cost and security, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finally decided to attend the “solidarity” march in Paris on Sunday, ostensibly in support of “free expression” and other “Western values.” The march had been called in the wake of the […]

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected] contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]