Asia-Pacific: Pumping up the Next Military Conflict. American Exceptionalism to the Rescue

U.S. Secretary of War Leon Panetta is making a tour of the Asia-Pacific where he is pumping up the next military conflict. Yesterday I heard he was in Vietnam trying to close a deal to allow the U.S. Navy to once again have access to the base at Cam Ranh Bay.

Before leaving on this trip Panetta made the speaking rounds back home to consolidate U.S. media and build public support for Obama’s “pivot” into the Asia-Pacific. “One of the key projects that your generation will have to face is sustaining and enhancing American strength across the great maritime region of the Pacific,” he told graduates of U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland last week.

“China’s military is growing and modernizing. We must be vigilant. We must be strong. We must be prepared to confront any challenge,” Panetta said.

While in Singapore Panetta stated, “By 2020, the Navy will re-posture its forces from today’s roughly 50/50 percent split between the Pacific and the Atlantic to about a 60/40 split between those oceans. That will include six aircraft carriers in this region, a majority of our cruisers, destroyers, littoral combat ships, and submarines.. ..to project power and operate in the Asia-Pacific. ”

He told an audience of Asian military officials that the U.S. planned new investments in capabilities needed “to project power and operate in the Asia-Pacific, ” including radar-evading fighter jets, a new long-distance bomber, electronic warfare and missile defenses. The message to them is essentially – play along with us and we will share a piece of the action with you.

The Pentagon has a name for this new strategy – its called the AirSea Battle fighting “concept”.

This strategy is our course the primary reason that the South Korean Navy, at the behest of the Pentagon, is building the Navy base on Jeju Island. The U.S. Navy needs more ports to dock their warships.

Not everyone though is getting on-board this dangerous, provocative, and expensive Obama plan. “AirSea Battle is demonizing China,” retired Gen. James Cartwright, former vice-chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said last week. “That’s not in anybody’s interest.”

While Panetta was speaking at the U.S. Naval Academy, Obama was at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado (also home of the Air Force Space Command). He was explaining the “pivot” to the future leaders of the Air Force.

V-P Joseph Biden got the West Point gig and he told the Army cadets that the U.S. would now “rebalance” its foreign policy with greater emphasis on the Asia-Pacific.

The Obama team is making the rounds to sell this new policy. They know the American people are “war weary” so they must begin to create the fear of a growing new threat in the Asia-Pacific – namely China.

Panetta put the name to it when he spoke to the Naval cadets in Annapolis. He called this new mission a “great challenge” and a “security burden to advance peace”.

It’s the old white man’s burden stuff once again. American exceptionalism to the rescue.

Bruce K. Gagnon Coordinator Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space PO Box 652 Brunswick, ME 04011 (207) 443-9502 globalnet@mindsprin g.com www.space4peace. org http://space4peace. blogspot. com/ (blog)


Articles by: Bruce Gagnon

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Centre of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post Global Research articles on community internet sites as long the source and copyright are acknowledged together with a hyperlink to the original Global Research article. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]