First Light: Representative John Murtha instigates Historical Upheaval

In-depth Report:

Last week, America’s troubled sleep was shattered by a trumpet blast of truth sounding deep in Washington’s corridors of power, where the rule of the Lie has held sway for so long. This intrusion of reality into the bloodstained fantasyland of the Bush Regime comes late in the day for the moribund Republic — perhaps too late — but it has struck a mighty blow against the Lie’s adherents, driving them into spasms of hysterical panic, like rats exposed suddenly to the light.

The unlikely instigator of this historic upheaval was U.S. Representative John Murtha, the 73-year-old conservative Democrat and war hawk, one of many “opposition” leaders who once strongly backed President George W. Bush’s murderous folly in Iraq. Murtha, a Vietnam vet, has been a stalwart of the military-industrial complex for decades, supporting U.S. wars around the world and showering legislative largess on the weapons industry — which has obligingly kicked back lobbying contracts to his kin and friends, The Los Angeles Times reports.

But a penchant for typical backroom grease is not necessarily incompatible with political courage. And Murtha showed plenty of the latter when he rocked Washington with a truly revolutionary act in these degraded times: stating the obvious. Calling Bush’s war “a flawed policy wrapped in an illusion,” Murtha said U.S. forces should “redeploy” out of Iraq immediately; otherwise, Iraqis will never feel free, the insurgency will grow, terrorism will spread and the United States will sink further into debt and dishonor, putting the nation’s very survival at stake.

This riot of understatement has been self-evident to most sentient beings for a long time; that it is now sinking into the occluded consciousness of Potomac power players is a turning point of genuine significance. Although Murtha was immediately assaulted in one of the most raucous displays of bile ever seen in Congress — with Bushist attack dogs labeling the war-wounded Pentagon patron a coward, traitor and terrorist-appeaser — his about-face has brought the so-called “extremist” antiwar position of swift withdrawal squarely into the political mainstream, and it won’t go away now. And why should it? After all, it just happens to be the position of a majority of the American people, as poll after poll reveals.

None of this means the Bush nightmare is over, of course; not by the longest shot. This gang will grow ever more vicious as their support crumbles; in fact, it’s a good bet that the worst is yet to come. The Bushists know that they have prison sentences hanging over their heads if they ever lose their grip on power. They will either do “whatever it takes” to keep holding the whip hand — in which case we are in for political and social strife the likes of which America has not seen since the Civil War — or, at the very least, they will make things bad enough that the nation’s power elite will negotiate a settlement, as in Richard Nixon’s day: We won’t prosecute you if you’ll just go away. In any case, it won’t be pleasant.

So no false hopes of a new day dawning. Let’s not forget what happened after the “new dawn” after Nixon’s departure: Six years later, Ronald Reagan was in office with an even worse crew — a lunatic fringe of aggressive militarists, hard-right ideologues and religious extremists allied with rapacious corporate elitists, all bent on destroying the idea of a common good beyond the bottom line. This poison has gone deep into the American bloodstream, and its virulence has been increased a thousandfold by the current regime. Bush’s exit won’t cure the body politic of this wasting disease.

Nor will it halt the voracious system of dominance and empire that has driven U.S. foreign policy — under Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives — for the past 60 years, covering the earth with more than 700 military bases while waging ceaseless war, directly and by proxy. Indeed, war profiteering has become essential to the wealth and power of the elite, and is now deeply embedded in the U.S. economy as a whole. Bush accelerated this all-devouring engine into overdrive; but he didn’t create it, and his departure won’t derail it.

Thus, even if the Bush Regime collapses entirely, we will still face an uphill battle against “Bushism” and all the long-term currents it represents. We must also guard against something even worse rising in its place. For the Bush years have shown how fragile American democracy is, how relatively little it takes for a predatory faction to seize the state and manipulate the public, cow the opposition, intimidate the press and use violence in pursuit of loot and power. The template is there now, and it’s entirely conceivable, perhaps inevitable, that some new would-be dictator — more competent, more subtle, more adroit than the ludicrous klutz from Crawford — will use it to create a more efficient and durable instrument of domination.

Still, the immediate task at hand — ending the bloody war crime in Iraq and restoring some vestige of legality and reality to American politics — is a tall enough order. So we should take heart from events like Murtha’s declaration and Bush’s freefall in the polls. There has been a shift in the political landscape, which provides cautious but credible grounds for hope of some measure of change. Not a false triumphalism, for there is never any final “triumph” in human affairs; there is only the continual, never-ending task of trying to rise above our worst instincts. But for the first time in years, the sun of possibility has broken through the stinking murk of the Bush Imperium.

Annotations

www.house.gov/apps/list/press/pa12_murtha/pr051117iraq.html
War in Iraq
Representative John Murtha, Nov. 17, 2005

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/18/AR2005111802896_pf.html
House Rejects Iraq Pullout After GOP Forces a Vote
Washington Post, Nov. 19, 2005

www.nytimes.com/2005/11/19/national/19military.html?emc=eta1&pagewanted=print
Uproar in House as Parties Clash on Iraq Pullout
New York Times, Nov. 18, 2005

www.juancole.com/2005/11/straw-man-resolution-in-congress.html
Straw Man Resolution in Congress: Joking around with the Lives of the Troops
Informed Comment, Nov. 16, 2005

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/17/AR2005111701536_pf.html
An Unlikely Lonesome Dove
Washington Post, Nov. 18, 2005

nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1122nj1.htm#
Key Bush Intelligence Briefing Kept From Hill Panel
National Journal, Nov. 22, 2005

www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11076.htm
The betrayed mothers of America
The Independent, Nov. 19, 2005

www.chris-floyd.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=294&Itemid=1
The Gates of Hell
Empire Burlesque, Nov. 22, 2005

www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11072.htm
Vegetarians Between Meals
Common Dreams, Nov. 18, 2005

www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/13242995.htm
Dishonest and reprehensible’ words from Dick Cheney
Knight-Ridder, Nov. 23, 2005

news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article328526.ece
The spoils of war
The Independent, Nov. 22, 2005

www.livejournal.com/%7Emparent7777/103785.html
Lobbyist’s Brother Guided House Bill
Los Angeles Times, June 13, 2005

Articles by: Chris Floyd

Related content:

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]